*Health issues>>>Men's Health issues

what are the circumcision style?

Issue
I would like to know what are the circumcisions style and what is the more important? and why of these styles are more health? I would like to know why the circumsicion has different styles and wat is the best? and what are you then?

Best Tip

Umm, there's partial or full, low or high, loose/moderate/tight (see link below). The downside of a "low" circumcision is that it removes most/all of the inner foreskin, which is really sensitive. The downside of a "tight" circumcision is that there's little/no skin mobility, making lube almost necessary and in extreme cases, causes pain upon erection. Infant circumcisions are hard to tell the outcome of (which is why it should be avoided), but you can essentially choose as an adult. Source(s): http://www.geocities.com/halfclip/style/...

Others
huh>?
Circumcision is the removal of some or all of the foreskin (prepuce) from the penis. The frenulum may also be removed at the same time, in a procedure called frenectomy. The word "circumcision" comes from Latin circum (meaning "around") and caedere (meaning "to cut"). The practice of circumcision predates recorded human history, with depictions found in stone-age cave drawings and Egyptian tombs. The origins of the practice are lost in antiquity. Theories include that circumcision is a form of ritual sacrifice or offering, a sign of submission to a deity, a rite of passage to adulthood, a mark of defeat or slavery, or an attempt to alter esthetics or sexuality. Circumcision of males is a religious requirement of the Muslim and Jewish faiths, commonly, but not exclusively, performed on the eighth day after birth. It is also practiced by the majority of Americans, South Koreans and Filipinos.

The American Medical Association, in a report confined to discussing circumcisions that are not performed for ritualistic or religious purposes, states that medical associations in the US, Australia, and Canada do not recommend 鈥渘on-therapeutic鈥?circumcision, which it defines as non-religious, non-ritualistic, not medically necessary, elective circumcision of male newborns. In the US when non-ritualistic elective circumcision is chosen, it is largely because of social or cultural expectations, rather than medical concerns. The genital integrity movement condemns infant circumcision as a form of male genital mutilation that they consider comparable to female genital cutting. Those who support circumcision sometimes explain their views in terms of the perceived medical benefits of the procedure.

Circumcision is recommended by some physicians to treat medical conditions in males, such as phimosis, chronic inflammation of the penis, and penile cancer while other physicians believe there are less invasive treatments for these conditions that can be tried first
Why do you want to know all of this?

Different doctors use different styles. None are more healthy than others, they're all about the same.

The doctor that delivered my son gave him his circumcision, by tying a string around the foreskin and putting a plastic ring around it. The string works by cutting through the foreskin and cutting it off while the plastic ring held it into place. I've heard it's also the way they crop dogs' tails, although I'm not sure on that one.
I only know of two versions, partial and full. Full is the easiest to maintain good hygiene with, non-circumcised is the hardest. Partial/full circumcision refers to how much of the foreskin is removed. If you are going to have anything removed, I think you should go whoe hog (so to speak,) same amount of pain, less smegma.
Many years ago they cut circumcisions too much (removed too much skin) and it resulted in men being in pain as there was not enough skin to stretch.

Now there are doctors that leave some skin but not all... I consider it a half way circumcision, and I personally feel it's not as clean as a complete circumcision. But these are probably done by doctors who don't agree with circumcision practices, so doing it half way makes the kid feel he has one (to fit in, anyway, with brothers, father, peers).

My second son has a normal circumcision, not too tight, but not half way done. He will not have difficulty as first son keeping clean.

The only thing strange is that they look completely different so in retrospect I wish I had used same doctor to cut both.